Are these not good enough reasons to impeach Bush ?

All you have to do is PROVE it, with FACTS not sound bites, political ads, or forgeign propaganda. Does obstructing "honest" elections mean making it harder for the dead in Chicago to vote or guarranteeing the U.S. military votes WILL be counted? CIA agents (she was a yst, not a female James Bond) are not allowed to use ets for private or poltical gains, as her husband was doing, "outing" her instead of a reprimand was not right, but better than "silencing". The U.S. Constitution does not guarrantee any rights to non-citizens, especially not ones plotting to attack this country or helping those that are. AND you have to show his actions are different not only from any predecessor in the White House, but democrats will be very careful not to impeach him for anything they might want to do themselves. Lying under oath in his depsotion in the Kathleen Willey/Gennifer Flowers ual harment suit about Monica Lewinski, and the dress surfaing to prove he lied under oath and thereby thwarted justice, was a criminal act they could PROVE. It was not to defend the country from terrorism, it was to defend Bubba's poor judgement and being arrogant enough to think he was untouchable by justice. Clinton byped Congress all the time with things like the "Kyoto Treaty" which since Bush was elected (YES he won, no matter how many times they recounted and punched chads out for Gore) has been called the "Kyoto Accord" because Clinton tried to enforce it without ratification of Congress, wait and see if democrats p it, because it gives an unfair advantage to bigger polluters like China and India and gives money to undeveloped countries by allowing them to sell "pollution credits" to polluting ones, it penalized the USA more than anyone else, naturally they all want it. Impeached means put under congressional review. Jim Carville, Al Franken and Bob Shrum are very effective political spinsters, they are not telling "facts" they are trying persuade undecided and reaffirm the left wing and democrats for political purposes, that is their job, what they say is not reality, it will not hold up in court . Compared to things democrat Presidents have done in the past, you would have a hard time presenting your list in court, double standards for dems or reps only works in the media. Havn't you noticed the great concern for exposing Mark Foley or the Valerie Plame matter can wait for years until an election is coming to be disclosed by the press? It is as much propaganda as anything you accuse Bush of spreading. Stick with facts, learn the history of each President, such as Lincoln, who did more to tamper with the balance of powers than anyone else before or since. The Katrina disaster began with a mayor who had been given billions in federal aid to develope a plan and repair floodwalls but had spent it on a lot of talk and studies and shoddy contractor repairs, that was not Bush's fault, maybe help should have got there sooner but New Orleans was not the only place impacted and both mayor and state governor declined help at first and even while critizing federal response later couldn't coordinate where they needed help, shelter, food supplies or law enforcement , local planning is the job of local officials, the feds will send in what they are asked for where it is needed, but they need to be told first. The locals have to ASK the Feds to come in, and have a plan for the response that fits the specific characteristics of their community. That is what your local taxdollar supported politicians are SUPPOSED to be doing in office. The sad thing is New Orleans will be no better prepared if hit again tomorrow. It also proved the folly of sending money, aid and resources to tsunami relief in Indonesia and earthquake relief in Pakistan when we had our own disaster and could have used those supplies and donations right here at home. The Commander in chief can do anything he wants for up to 90 days, including nuke some country off the map, without letting Congress know. Bottom line don't listen to the sound bites, research the FACTS, read the whole thing, it's easy to mouth what someone else says, but people only spread things and start movements for a reason, and that reason usually benefits themselves. This ten minutes of my life might net two points in a useless rating system anyways but I said it because I want you to understand it's not smart to repeat someone else, it's smart to study, observe and think for yourself. Do not say anyone has violated any binding convention, contract or agreement or law, without specific citation, or you are just as guilty of slander/libel if wrong. Emotions must be kept out of legal debate, just the facts matter. Impeachment has political motivations, but it must follow LEGAL findings of FACT.